Re: *SPAM* [ciq] Fwd: Fw: use of GML in OASIS xAL

[Ram Kumar <kumar.sydney@gmail.com>]

Hi Colin,

 

I could not make it to Canberra at the last minute due to some unexpected

personal issues.

 

Send me a soft copy of your edits and notes and I will look into it.

 

Regards,

 

Ram

 

On 12/7/05, Colin.Wallis@ssc.govt.nz <Colin.Wallis@ssc.govt.nz > wrote:

 

Thanks Ram

 

Liz and I both agree that more prescription in the GML container would be a good idea. 

 

Cheers

Colin

PS: I have gone through the Specification tidying up bits of grammar and consistency plus one or two suggestions. It is in hard copy at present.  I was intending to hand it to you yesterday in Canberra.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ram Kumar [mailto: kumar.sydney@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 7 December 2005 8:59 a.m.
To: ciq@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: *SPAM* [ciq] Fwd: Fw: use of GML in OASIS xAL

CIQ TC,

 

The revised draft V3.0 specifications (after 30 days public review) is close to

completion for another 60 day public review. Some clean up work on xPRL is

being done at this stage. In addition, Open geospatial group is helping us to

include a subschema of GML in our xAL specification. Please see below the

discussion between Max Voskob and GML group regarding this.

 

I hope to have the v3.0 specs. released in a week's time.

 

Regards,

 

Ram

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ram Kumar < KUMA1RAM@police.nsw.gov.au>
Date: Dec 6, 2005 12:29 PM
Subject: Fw: use of GML in OASIS xAL
To: kumar.sydney@gmail.com


----- Forwarded by Ram Kumar/1115034/Staff/NSWPolice on 06/12/2005 12:25 -----
 

"'Max Voskob'" <max.voskob@paradise.net.nz >

06/12/2005 07:58

To	sbacharach@opengeospatial.org
cc	KUMA1RAM@police.nsw.gov.au
Subject	RE: use of GML in OASIS xAL

From: max.voskob@paradise.net.nz
To: sbacharach@opengeospatial.org
Cc: CTSV.KUMA1RAM@POLICE.NSW.GOV.AU
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 09:58:23 +1300
Subject: RE: use of GML in OASIS xAL


---------------------------------------------------
Note: This message was written with the unsupported
character set 'utf-8'. Some characters may have
been substituted.
---------------------------------------------------


Thanx Sam,

We are looking forward to the info.

Please, keep it simple and informal at this stage. We just want to get the ball rolling.

Cheers,
Max?

-----Original Message-----
From: Sam A. Bacharach [mailto:sbacharach@opengeospatial.org ]?
Sent: Tuesday, 6 December 2005 08:07
To: Max Voskob
Cc: Carl Reed
Subject: RE: use of GML in OASIS xAL

Max,

I have finally located a member that has something for you to look at.

As you note, that specific schema or schema fragment is not present in the specification itself.

When I get the document I will send it to you, but I must caution that this is not a 'finished' piece of work.  In fact your evaluation -- what does it not enable that you need? -- would be very helpful.  I am working with Carl Reed, our Executive Directo
r of the Specification Program, to assemble a small team that can respond to your input.

We would like to work it up and then pass it through both organizations for approval at the same time -- yours as part of the xAL specification, and ours as one more 'schema fragment' that us useful as a plug in to other non-OGC schemas.

Regards,

Sam

-----Original Message-----
From: Max Voskob [mailto:max.voskob@paradise.net.nz ]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 12:31 PM
To: sbacharach@opengeospatial.org
Subject: use of GML in OASIS xAL


Hi Sam,

I'd like to get some assistance from OGC on behalf of OASIS CIQ TC ( http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ciq).

xAL specification ( http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/documents.php) provides means for describing postal and physical addresses. Also, we have a requirement for expressing geospatial infromation as part of an address.
Currently, we have a container that references the entire GML namespace leaving it to the adopters to decide how they apply GML there.
We'd like to make it a easiers for adopters and reference appropriate GML structures directly, instead of allowing to use anything from GML.

Unfortuanately, we do not have any GML expertise and my ad-hoc approach to this didn't result in a meaningful solution. Would it be possible to give us some assistance in this area?

Kind regards,
Max Voskob










All mail is subject to content scanning for possible violation of New South Wales Police
electronic Mail Policy. All persons are required to familiarise themselves with the
content of the policy located on the MEMO Bulletin Board and on the NSWP Intranet.

This message and any attachment is confidential and may
be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you
have received it by mistake, please let us know by reply
and then delete it from your system; you should not copy
the message or disclose its contents to anyone.