Thanks, Gershon. I've now edited most of
the terms and handled all but five or six of the review topics. (Paul
and Jeff, I'll be sending you e-mail ...)
However, I noticed that the topic does not contain any of the linking
and addressing terminology; I thought we had agreed to move it there.
Also, it is lacking definitions for "referencing element" and
"referenced element"; can someone provide them?
Kris
Gershon Joseph (gerjosep) wrote:
1E1355AB5D71474AB186AE542E21AD1709B060E5@xmb-sjc-22c.amer.cisco.com"
type="cite">
Hi Kris,
I have updated the topic to address most of this
thread. The decision was to sort the items within each group
alphabetically. I have updated some of the group titles based on the
discussions during the TC meetings you missed. The main thing I have
not done is to ensure the new terms are correctly used throughout the
document, and that all old terms are removed or fixed, whichever is
appropriate.
There is likely to still be some quibbling over
the group titles, but I think I've addressed all the issues that were
discussed. In some cases no-one came up with better titles, so I left
the previous one or attempted to improve it.
--
Gershon
I am reworking the Terminology topic according
to the review comments and the following discussion on the TC mailing
list:
Can anyone clarify for me what decision was made
about how to group the terms? On the first terminology call which I
chaired, we decided that Gershon would attempt to devise an ordering
scheme, but that we would default to simply listing the terms in
alphabetical order if the group did not come to a consensus on how to
group the terms.
Was a grouping order agreed upon? Or should I simply alphabetize the
terms?
Kris
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
|