Re: [dita] Fwd: DITA 1.3 "XML mention" question

[Eliot Kimber <ekimber@contrext.com>]

OK, good to know. That raises my confidence level that we can leave things
as they have been. Just want to make 100% sure that what we had done is
now OK.

Cheers,

E.
—————
Eliot Kimber, Owner
Contrext, LLC
http://contrext.com




On 8/20/14, 10:21 AM, "Jirka Kosek" <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote:

>On 20.8.2014 15:17, Eliot Kimber wrote:
>> I've sent email to Liam Quin, XML Activity Lead at the W3C, to get
>> confirmation that this restriction has been removed. It's clearly
>>removed
>> by the errata to the XML 1.0 specification, but I'm not seeing a
>> corresponding errata to the XML 1.1 specification, so I'm not entirely
>> sure what the implications are. I've asked Liam for guidance.
>
>XML 1.1 is simply dead, so any erratas, clarifications are applied only
>to XML 1.0 (5th/latest edition).
>
>As I was one who proposed lifting of this restriction on names and was
>attending W3C XML Core WG meeting where this was discussed you can be
>sure that restriction has been removed.
>
>Main reason for removal was that you (DITA TC) were not only subject who
>defined and deployed elements starting with xml* as this restriction is
>not very well known and tools are not emitting any warnings. And since
>introduction of namespaces there is no reason to reserve prefix xml.
>Special elements and attributes can be put in xml: namespace (like
>xml:base for example).
>
>But of course you can double check with Liam, he was on this meeting as
>well.
>
>		Jirka (not on behalf of XML Core WG :-)
>
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> E.
>> —————
>> Eliot Kimber, Owner
>> Contrext, LLC
>> http://contrext.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 8/20/14, 3:21 AM, "Jirka Kosek" <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 19.8.2014 2:52, Nancy Harrison wrote:
>>>> We may need to revisit those element names, unless someone has a good
>>>> reason for why we wouldn't have to follow that part of the spec.
>>>
>>> Please note that this restriction on names has been recently removed
>>>from XML spec, see:
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/XML/xml-V10-5e-errata
>>>
>>> So you can now safely use element and attribute names starting with
>>>"xml".
>>>
>>> I thought that TC was already aware of this change when new xml*
>>> elements were introduced.
>>>
>>> 					Jirka
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>       Professional XML consulting and training services
>>>  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>    Bringing you XML Prague conference    http://xmlprague.cz
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>> 
>> 
>-- 
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Jirka Kosek      e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz      http://xmlguru.cz
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>       Professional XML consulting and training services
>  DocBook customization, custom XSLT/XSL-FO document processing
>------------------------------------------------------------------
> OASIS DocBook TC member, W3C Invited Expert, ISO JTC1/SC34 rep.
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>    Bringing you XML Prague conference    http://xmlprague.cz
>------------------------------------------------------------------
>