[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] Schematron problem in DB5 grammar
/ Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> was heard to say: | I think that we could left RNC schema intact as it is mostly source | format and I don't know any Schematron validator which is able to | extract rules from RNC files. However I would suggest to surround rule | elements by pattern element in RNG schemas. This should be matter of | simple XSLT transformation in the build process. We also should add | | <s:ns prefix="db" uri="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" | xmlns:s="http://www.ascc.net/xml/schematron"/> | | to the top of RNG schema. This is good practice in Schematron because | of YOU-KNOW-WHO (QNames in attribute values ;-) and some Schematron | implementatios are not working without this. It looks like we're encountering some interoperability issues with the schematron rules embedded directly in the schema. I'm tempted to yank them out entirely in 5.0b1 and simply ship a separate Schematron schema. If we can get the tools vendors to some consensus on how to encode Schematron rules inside a RELAX NG grammar, we can start shipping them that way again. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The richness of life lies in http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | memories we have Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | forgotten.--Cesare Pavese
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]