[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] Schematron problem in DB5 grammar
Norman Walsh wrote: > It looks like we're encountering some interoperability issues with the > schematron rules embedded directly in the schema. I'm tempted to yank > them out entirely in 5.0b1 and simply ship a separate Schematron > schema. I agree that we should ship separate Schematron schema. I think that we can left Schematron rules inside RELAX NG because in some tools it works and some are just ignoring it. I didn't came across tool that will complain about current schema (no sch:pattern and sch:ns). But if there is such tool, we should definitively remove Schematron rules until this problem gets resolved. > If we can get the tools vendors to some consensus on how to encode > Schematron rules inside a RELAX NG grammar, we can start shipping them > that way again. Yep. Probably we should try to put together list of RELAX NG+Schematron implementations against we could test schemas. There are validators that I know: MSV (+relames) Topologi Schematron Validator oXygen Relaxed (product of my student, see http://badame.vse.cz/validator/) Jirka -- ------------------------------------------------------------------ Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://www.kosek.cz ------------------------------------------------------------------ Profesionální školení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML. Podívejte se na náš nově spuštěný web http://DocBook.cz Podrobný přehled školení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/ ------------------------------------------------------------------ Nejbližší termíny školení: DocBook 5.-7.12. * XSL-FO 19.-20.12. XSLT 17.-20.10. * XML schémata (včetně RELAX NG) 7.-9.11. ------------------------------------------------------------------
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]