Re: [ebsoa] Fwd: Editors Action Item

["Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>]

Any thoughts on the question below?

Joe

Chiusano Joseph wrote:
> 
> Thanks Sally. I noted that you did not reference ebXML in the audience
> description (not saying that that is a good or bad thing - just an
> observation). This brings up the question: If someone did not - for
> whatever reason - "subscribe" to the "ebXML way of doing things", how
> useful to them is our final output intended to be?
> 
> 100% useful? 50? 10?
> 
> Thanks,
> Joe
> 
> "Sally St. Amand" wrote:
> >
> > The draft I mentioned in yesterday's call.
> >
> > Hamid's paper serves as a good opening to address what I see as a
> > convergence and opportunity. As I said in yesterday's call there has
> > been an evolution on the business side that tracks the technical
> > evolution that Hamid described so well. More recent efforts to
> > standardize and quantify business processes have included
> > Reengineering and Six Sigma. SOA cuts across both tech and business
> > process.
> >
> > As I see it our challenge is to convey the scope, scale and provide
> > the means to achieve implementation. That is define the concept and
> > translate it into solutions that can be adapted to be operational. My
> > hope is that the spec will also serve as a communications/education
> > doc to all the constituencies.
> >
> > Anyway, something to chew on.
> > Sally
> >
> >
> >     ---------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Subject: Editors Action Item
> > Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 07:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: "Sally St. Amand" <sallystamand@yahoo.com>
> > To: Matthew MacKenzie <mattm@adobe.com>
> >
> > Matt
> >
> > Attached is a first write of the paragraph on the audience for the
> > specification. Would you take a look at it, revise and add.
> >
> > I was looking at it to go in the Introduction at the end of line 72
> > before the paragraph on standards
> >
> > Just a comment--I would hope we can have some discussion so we can see
> > where people are before we start writing the spec. Which is why I
> > suggested using the white paper as a basis for discussion. I think we
> > need to build some concensus and I suspect we are a long way from
> > that.
> > Sally
> >
> >                          Name: SOAaudience.doc
> >    SOAaudience.doc       Type: WINWORD File (application/msword)
> >                      Encoding: base64
> >                   Description: SOAaudience.doc
> 
> --
> Kind Regards,
> Joseph Chiusano
> Associate
> Booz | Allen | Hamilton

-- 
Kind Regards,
Joseph Chiusano
Associate
Booz | Allen | Hamilton