Re: [ebxml-bp] WSDL / BPSS proposal

["Anders W. Tell" <anderst@toolsmiths.se>]

Sally St. Amand wrote:

> What I hear Anders saying is there is a need to provide traceability. 
> For each pattern there needs to be the ability to determine why/who 
> failed, not just a failure.
> The specificastion has to map to the legal requirements; the UN model 
> makes the most sense as many (most?) governments are behind the curve 
> and when pushed will probably adopt the UN model.
> Sally


Yes, It has to to with traceability but more evidentiary requirements 
and specifically the outcome of a transaction in relation to LAW. 
Knowing who was the failing party is crusial in most legal and business 
situation.

This extraction from UN Rec. 31 (TPA) shows that the signing parties 
must decide,agree where/when the legal effect is. [received by / sent 
to] . These decision affects directly the BT statemachine.

"3.2.2 Revocation
Any offer shall, unless otherwise agreed or expressly
stated in the offer [be / not be] revocable. If
revocable, an offer may only be revoked if notice of
such revocation is [received by / sent to] the receiver
of the offer before acceptance has been [received by /
sent to] the sender."


/anders

-- 
/////////////////////////////////////
/ Business Collaboration Toolsmiths /
/ website: <www.toolsmiths.se>      /
/ email: <anderst@toolsmiths.se>    /
/ phone: +46 8 545 885 87           /
/ mobile: +46 70 546 66 03          /
/////////////////////////////////////