Re: [ebxml-bp] Re: [ebxml-bp-comment] Public Comment

[Monica J Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

Radha: I continue as specified to address your questions. This is the 
last email (at least for now) to address part of the 2. item.

 2. ebBP: On specific ebBP possible changes, I will address these 
individually.

The items 1 (to CPPA) and 3 (for other documents) has already been sent 
today. Thanks.

> >6. The difference between Substantive business message and normal
> business message since both refers to the same in many situations.
> >
> mm1: We can increase the description to make this consistent. I will
> work through in the specification where changes may be required. This is
> editorial in nature.
>
>-     O.k.
>  
>
There are actually multiple references to substantive and 
non-substantive, with a clear definition (for example, sections 
3.4.9.3.2, 3.5.1.1 and 3.6.1).
Unfortunately I am unable to locate a term 'normal business message,' in 
the specification. I agree we don't label every reference of business 
message. I've provided the references for you to review to determine if 
the question is still open. Thank you, Radha again for your comments. 
Your additional feedback is most welcome.

Section 3.4
Change from:
The Business Collaboration is defined as a choreography of Business 
Transactions performed relative to each other.

The following section describes the concepts of a Business 
Collaboration, a Business Transaction, a Business Document Flow, and 
Choreography.

Change to:
The Business Collaboration is defined as a choreography of Business 
Transactions performed relative to each other.

The following section describes the concepts of a Business 
Collaboration, a Business Transaction, a Business Document Flow, and 
Choreography.  Business messages and Business Signals are discussed 
throughout.  A business message is typically associated with a Business 
Document Flow rather than a Business Signal.