Re: [ebxml-cppa-negot] Notes on publication of a party's NDD

["Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>]

Marty Sachs wrote......

>
>         *One Party does not Publish an NDD*
>
>     Consider defining more precisely the case where a /Party/ does not
>     publish an /NDD/. Following is one possibility: 
>     If a /Party/ does not publish an /NDD/, it means that the /Party/
>     will not negotiate. This requires a /Party/ to publish an /NDD/ if
>     the /Party/ is willing to negotiate. 
>     Add a negotiability indicator to the /NDD/. Its values could be:
>
>         * Normal /NDD/ that indicates what is negotiable.
>         * Contact me privately for my /NDD/.
>         * Everything is negotiable.  With this value of the indicator,
>           the /Party/ does not include any specific items in the NDD.
>
mm1: Marty, when the last item occurs, we currently can't handle it 
because several items in version 1 are undefined for negotiation.