[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: Quick Update on EDXL DE
Sorry, Elysa, I'm out of town all day on the 14th. Longsdtanding and wayyyyy overdue client meeting. Noway I can miss it. However, Art can report on the SC recommendations. Regrets, Rex At 10:28 AM -0600 12/9/05, Elysa Jones wrote: >Rex and others, > >Thanks so much for the diligence that you all applied to getting the >EDXL -DE to this point. I was on travel most of this week and got >behind. It seems the outstanding issue has to do with the >difference of opinion between David and Renato on what appears to be >a substantive change to the EDXL-DE that would require another >comment period. I would like to remind every one that this comment >period could be only 15 days rather than the 60- days. This is >something that I would like for us to vote on at the next meeting. >Let's make sure that only technical soundness drives this, so we can >be as thorough as possible when this goes out. We made the decision >last month that we were not going to try to rush this through but >let us certainly focus on it now and decide wether to make this >change or not and go forward. > >As for the next meeting, I for one will not be able to make the >meeting time next Tues, Dec 13. I would like to move this meeting >to Dec 14 at the same time. Please reply back if this is a problem >for you. Also, if someone would like to volunteer a toll free >telecon line, I would appreciate it. If I haven't heard from anyone >by a couple of hours before the meeting, I'll get another line and >post the number on the site. > >Thanks again for all the work you do to promote emergency management >standards, >Elysa Jones, Chair >OASIS EM-TC >Engineering Program Manager >Warning Systems, Inc. >256-880-8702 x102 >256-694-8702 cell > > >At 09:16 AM 12/7/2005, Rex Brooks wrote: >>Hi Elysa, >> >>We got through most of the outstanding issues and should have the >>spec harmonized up to this with the schema in lockstep as much as >>is possible. Patti Got the spec out last night, bless her. However, >>it still will need to be gone over with a fine tooth comb.That >>couldn't have been easy after a two and a half hour meeting. >> >>We have one outstanding issue which the whole TC will have to >>discuss but we have gone through the last issues list and the spec >>and Dave's comments from yesterday. It involves namespacing >>xmlContent and I am not even going to try to describe it >>completely. Hopefully someone will offer a summary. I have a >>meeting to get to, but I wanted to send you an update. >> >>However, It is highly unlikely that we would be able to make our >>deadline for this month, even if we could get a quorum today, which >>would be difficult since I, myself have a full day laid out ahead >>of me. We also decided to stay put with the area issue, pending >>someone or the GIS SC coming forward with an actual proposal. Its a >>can of worms, and perhaps after I get a few more things done to >>catch up from my bout of pneumonia, I can devote some time to it, >>but I'm not promising anything before we finish up v1.0. At best it >>could be a 1.1 proposal from me, since anything in this arena that >>has half a chance will also have to have a boatload of supporters >>to do more than muddy up the already roiling waters around this >>issue. >> >>Ciao, >>Rex >>-- >>Rex Brooks >>President, CEO >>Starbourne Communications Design >>GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison >>Berkeley, CA 94702 >>Tel: 510-849-2309 -- Rex Brooks President, CEO Starbourne Communications Design GeoAddress: 1361-A Addison Berkeley, CA 94702 Tel: 510-849-2309
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]