RE: Profiling in the News: Was: RE: Taxonomies, URN's etc..

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

But then we will test it to see if it 
fits various theories of humanity.  Or 
in other terms, we'll test it against 
various applications.  If the agent 
says it is human, but can't be used in 
an HCI testing room, it fails.

No blood.  We are working on scenario 
building.  That is how we better define 
the domains.  It is a classic technique 
for modern software engineering to enable 
one to select domains rather than concentrating 
to early on representations.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Rex Brooks [mailto:rexb@starbourne.com]

Gee, no blood to mop up?

You guys are no fun!

I'm kidding. Just for the newcomers: This exhange is very close to 
operational, whereas my use of the lamppost was aimed at the more 
fundamental point that barring some obvious miscreant, we'll 
basically have to accept as human as any entity that asserts itself 
as human.