Re: good bye

[Ranjeeth Kumar Thunga <rkthunga@humanmarkup.org>]

This is an totally open forum, and free speech prevails.
In such an open forum, open to everyone, centered around our primary
mission.

Each of us can state whatever we feel is necessary or appropriate.  The
balance of poets and precision workers, dreamers and workers, idealists and
pragmatists all provide the necessary balance for these efforts to keep it
truly centered and representative.

We might be reacting emotionally, we might not be...the important thing is
that this forum remains free, centered around our mission, fully accepting
the imprecision of the current communication systems we are dealing with,
and fully accepting the heightened emotional states we are all in right now.

Ulitmately, we'll all make the choices that are best use of our abilities.

Ranjeeth Kumar Thunga





----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Stephen Prueitt" <bcngroup@erols.com>
To: <humanmarkup-comment@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:50 PM
Subject: good bye


>
>
>
> I was interested in working within this group before the tragedy.  The
fact
> of this kind of tragedy has long been predicted, and there will be others
to
> come.  With a shallow IT and a funding mechanism that will not address
core
> issues (for example as related to using gesturing as part of the message)
> then America and the democratic countries around the world will be hit and
> hit again unexpectedly by those populations of people who are in dispare.
>
> ***
>
> It seems that I am not understood in my message.
>
> A "Pribram-Hameroff-Penrose Viewpoint" mentioned in the BCNGroup Charter
is
> not a
>
> "theory of human everything ,expressed> in HumanMarkup <that> is really
> rather embarrassing to read" - as Mr Gardner has claimed.  He him, sadly
> shake my head and wonder why such comments must occur.  Mr. Gardner, just
> why are you embarrassed?  The theoritical work that I put forward has
> everything to do with how human's use their biological memory systems and
> anticipatory systems to make sense of the world.  It is not a perfect
> theory, but YOU HAVE NO THEORY do you?
>
> The Pribram-Hameroff-Penrose Viewpoint is a view of the current science in
> perceptual physics, cognitive neuroscience and from massive work on the
> problems of vetting intelligence through the digital structures of the
> Internet.  The notions of state-gesture pairing, mentioned in the work I
> referenced here, are related to a choreographing of behavioral actions.
>
> I do not understand this response from Mr. Gardner....  and ask that his
> insult to my work be censored.  I just can not imagine that SUN
Microsystems
> would have people like this working in this area.
>
> **
>
> If there is no concern for a deeper theory of behavior within the
> HumanMarkup process, then this is more of the same.  The topic maps (XTM)
> dialog is similarly poisoned by the type is behavior that is expressed by
> Mr. Gardner.  How can a community address an issue like knowledge
> representation when there are leaders in these communities that insult the
> science in such a profound way.
>
> I expected differently...  and apologize for speaking in this forum.
>
> I withdraw for the forum to let you do what ever it is that you where
doing.
>
> Any one wanting to have a positive discussion about issues of science, is
> welcome to seek me out.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>