[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: Applications: Intelligence systems (was Re: A new intelligenc eparadigm)
Since Dr Prueitt said "goodbye", I shall respect that message and pull him from the reply list. Still, his publised works are available to us and we can make the most of these and their references. I suspect the HCI research on the Amodeus project and the uncertainty oscillation phenomenon (system based choice and choice of choices) are related. Identification and selection are at a large scale, The Problem. Note that interior models and external models as well as selection based on linkage and potentially, punting to process to create linkage are seminal. Prueitt points off to the Russian applied semiotics works. Again, our initial intuitions on fields of study for synthesis are validated. We need to work out how to frame our results within the semantic web architecture. This seems straightforward to me given some of the examples we have been generating. I think a scenario/example-by-schema and RDF ontology method will work in the short run. I don't know how well our prototype schemas work for this but I think that if we apply some scenarios we can find out. We do well to study our critic's works. Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: Sean B. Palmer [mailto:sean@mysterylights.com] > http://www.acsa2000.net/notion_l.html > > "Ontology Based Document Understanding" This is indeed quite an impressive paper. The following point is probably the best quote:- "In each of these examples, the problem with translatability is that there are no containers to place meaning in target languages, unless that language has a similar referential type." It's one of those things which is so obvious, and yet goes unsaid way too often. Dr. Prueitt uses the examples of Marx/Pavlov scientific materialism as interpreted by USSR and the USA during the cold war, and of Hopi Indian sand drawings. I could add translations of the Tao Te Ching, Vedic texts, or pre-historic cave paintings to the mix. I'm not sure that I agree with Dr. Prueitt's suggestion that non boolean logic (analogue) is classed as absurd by Western academia, just not as well researched as boolean logic. Points of entry may include "glass bead game" quarters of semiotics, and Western classical investigations into just why Chinese Abacuses are so efficient.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC