RE: [humanmarkup-comment] Base Schema - thought

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

Let's step back and investigate the notion 
of *thought process*.  This may have some merit, 
but it means (at least to me), that this may 
not belong in the primary.   Note the following 
article and the emphasis on types of thought 
processes:

http://www.investigativepsych.com/explained.htm

We have briefly discussed the need for an adjunct 
to model processes that can use our categorical 
types as inputs and outputs.  We've not been 
able to tackle it yet.

len