RE: [imi] IMI TC Minutes, Dec 17th

["Scott Cantor" <cantor.2@osu.edu>]

Marc Goodner wrote on 2009-12-17:
> I believe Mike was going to follow up on the SAML 2.0 token profile with
you
> directly. I understood from the conversation that there were minor issue
> w.r.t. spelling.

There's a formatting glitch or two also, but that's fine. I just wanted to
know what it meant.

> The intent of accepting the 1.1 issue proposals was to facilitate
continued
> discussion/improvement within the context of a new draft.

I understand, I just wanted to make a point for the record. This is the
wrong direction to continue to plow, IMHO. None of my concerns have anything
to do with the functionality in question, either.
 
-- Scott