Re: [office-comment] Comments on Errata 01 (Committee Draft 03)

[Patrick Durusau <patrick@durusau.net>]

Murata-san,

Speaking strictly for myself I have a quick answer to your last comment:

MURATA Makoto (FAMILY Given) wrote:

<snip>
> (6) Rejected comment
>
> I do not agree on the following disposition.
>
> 	N0942:30 "In 15.4.1, subsection 8.8.4 of XSL is referenced, but
> 	it should be 7.8.4."
> 	Rejected, the text is correct. 
>
> I still believe that 7.8.4 is correct.
>
>   
Well, the comment should have read:

"In 15.4.1, subsection 8.8.4 of XSL is referenced, but it should be 7.8.8."

Our response to that comment (not the comment that was made) would have 
to be:

"Accepted."

In XSL version 1.0, the font-variant attribute being found in 7.8.8.

In ODF 1.0, second edition, the font-variant attribute is found in 15.4.1.

I am not sure how we all overlooked that one so would appreciate your 
checking XSL 1.0 and verifying my citation of section 7.8.8. (noting for 
completeness sake that 7.8.4 is font-size, a related but distinct concept.)

Hope you are having a great weekend!

Patrick

-- 
Patrick Durusau
patrick@durusau.net
Chair, V1 - US TAG to JTC 1/SC 34
Convener, JTC 1/SC 34/WG 3 (Topic Maps)
Editor, OpenDocument Format TC (OASIS), Project Editor ISO/IEC 26300
Co-Editor, ISO/IEC 13250-1, 13250-5 (Topic Maps)