[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [office] DSIG proposal - FYI - Root Element
Bob, I misunderstood the FYI note about simplification of the ODF DSIG proposal. I didn't realize the schema for <document-signatures xmlns="http://openoffice.org/2004/documentsignatures"> (and logical equivalents) was still being proposed. I will re-examine on that basis. - Dennis PS: I apologize for missing sny discussion of this proposal on the call. Alarm-clock pilot error. -----Original Message----- From: Bob Jolliffe [mailto:bobjolliffe@gmail.com] http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200901/msg00015.html Sent: Monday, January 05, 2009 05:27 To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org Cc: office TC; Jomar Silva Subject: Re: [office] DSIG proposal - FYI Hi Dennis 2009/1/5 Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamilton@acm.org>: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200901/msg00012.html [ ... ] > 2. References to Signed Material > 2.1 In this specification, detached signatures are found in XML documents > of the packages META-INF folder. In the simplified proposal, there is no > specified name, but one can expect that they are of MIME type > application/XML and the root element is <ds:Signature > xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#"> (or logical equivalent). Root element is actually: <document-signatures xmlns="http://openoffice.org/2004/documentsignatures"> which in turn contains ds:Signature children. See section 2.4 of part 3 (packaging). What is not specified is the mimetype of the signatures file. I suppose that should be done. [ ... ]
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]