[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [oic] Confused about the purpose of the Interop Profile
+1 I believe the use of normative language, a defined conformance target and conformance clauses in a document that is not expected to go past Committee Specification is inappropriate and not in keeping with the scope and identified deliverables of the OIC TC. - Dennis PS: That's especially a concern when matters that are not now and not expected to be in-scope for ODF itself are introduced (e.g., what someone can or cannot do using a product UI, and how a feature is observable by and governed by users at all). Although those may be quite worthy of address in some venue or another, it seems to me that we have to be very careful about how OIC speaks on such matters, assuming it is appropriate to speak as OIC at all under whatever the authority of the OASIS OIC TC is. -----Original Message----- From: Cherie Ekholm [mailto:cheriee@exchange.microsoft.com] <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oic/201003/msg00028.html> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 09:54 To: Hanssens Bart; oic@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [oic] Confused about the purpose of the Interop Profile I understand wanting to clarify the 1.1 standard - it often happens that after a standard is released and implementers start using it that areas that need clarification are exposed. I'd agree that this can be a detriment to interoperability. [ ... ] If the idea here is to put out a best practices guide or best practices profile as Bart says, why not call this just that? Cherie -----Original Message----- From: Hanssens Bart [mailto:Bart.Hanssens@fedict.be] <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oic/201003/msg00027.html> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2010 5:17 PM To: Cherie Ekholm; oic@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: RE: [oic] Confused about the purpose of the Interop Profile
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]