[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [oic] RE: Request to send out OIC TC "Interoperability Profile"for Public Review
Mary they are indeed different documents, sorry for the confusion :) Best regards Bart ________________________________________ From: Mary McRae [mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org] Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 7:58 PM To: Hanssens Bart Cc: dennis.hamilton@acm.org; oic@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [oic] RE: Request to send out OIC TC "Interoperability Profile" for Public Review I didn't even realize they were two different documents. m Mary P McRae Director, Standards Development Technical Committee Administrator OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society email: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org web: www.oasis-open.org twitter: @fiberartisan #oasisopen phone: 1.603.232.9090 Standards are like parachutes: they work best when they're open. On Mar 19, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Hanssens Bart wrote: > Mary, > > > Mm, that would be the State of Interop Report. Not the Interoperability Profile :-) > > Regarding the Interoperability Profile, I'm still not sure if the required changes for > public review can be performed without a new draft + vote ? (numbering the > sections) > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oic/201002/msg00048.html > > Can you enlighten us here ? Thanks :-) > > > Best regards > > Bart > > ________________________________________ > From: Mary McRae [marypmcrae@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 7:38 PM > To: dennis.hamilton@acm.org > Cc: Hanssens Bart; oic@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [oic] RE: Request to send out OIC TC "Interoperability Profile" for Public Review > > Hi Dennis, > > http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/201003/msg00009.html :) > > Mary > > > > On Mar 19, 2010, at 2:32 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > >> Since we are talking about the Interoperability Profile, I wondered what is >> happening with the Public Review of CD02 that was approved on February 9? >> >> May we assume that a CD02 rev01 is being produced to deal with the changes >> requested by the TC Administrator, and that there will be a ballot to >> approve that as CD03 for Public Review? >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Hanssens Bart [mailto:Bart.Hanssens@fedict.be] >> <http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/oic/201002/msg00048.html> >> Sent: Monday, February 15, 2010 05:46 >> To: Mary McRae; oic@lists.oasis-open.org >> Cc: tc-admin@oasis-open.org >> Subject: [oic] RE: Request to send out OIC TC "Interoperability Profile" for >> Public Review >> >> Hi Mary, >> >> >> thanks for reviewing this during the weekend ! >> >> [ ... ] >> >> >>> Suggestion: number the sections in sequence. Following the title put the >> ODF1.1 number. You already >>> have the numbers in each clause which is fine. >>> >>> example: 3.1 Document Processing and Conformance (ODF1.1 Section 1.5) >>> 3.2 MIME Types and File Name Extensions (ODF1.1 Section 1.7) >>> >>> You could leave out the ODF1.1 since that's clearly stated. >> >> Ok, since that changes the content, not the converpages, I assume a re-vote >> is required ? >> >> >> Best regards >> >> Bart >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that >> generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: >> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]