[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: identifiable effectivity requirements?
Hi All, I have been re-doing the effectivity stuff and noticed that although effectivity has an .id attribute, I cannot place an identification assignment on effectivity as the identification_item select type does not extend to this (or the subtypes of effectivity). I automatically tried to do this since we don't use the local id attributes, but are there any requirement for this? I note that generally, an instance of effectivity should not exist in isolation, i.e. it should either part of an effectivity assignment or part of a configuration effectivity - though there seems nothing to enforce this. Through these relationships, instances of effectivity can be identified (indirectly). The question I guess - is whether an instance of effectivity needs to be directly/uniquely identifiable? regards, Tim
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]