RE: [plcs-dex] Changes to productas indivdual

[Tim King <tmk@lsc.co.uk>]

Title: RE: [plcs-dex] Changes to productas indivdual

Excellent!  That was as discussed in Seattle and will prevent us all having the same debate every six months as we try to remember how we meant the model to work ;-)

As ever,
Tim.

P.S.  The other only people I wondered about being concerned was AP221 (David Leal).

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Bodington [mailto:rob.bodington@eurostep.com]
Sent: 21 October 2004 17:34
To: plcs-dex@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [plcs-dex] Changes to productas indivdual

Hi
There was a substantive ballot comment made against the product-as_individual module,

I have now redrafted the module in response to this and I will upload the changes to Sourceforge shortly.
But in the meantime here is the proposed new ARM (as agreed at the ballot comment resolution workshop).

Comments welcome - sooner would be better, as I am now fixing the MIM and the mapping.

Personally, I think the new approach is a lot cleaner.

Regards
Rob
-------------------------------------------  
Rob Bodington
Eurostep Limited
Web Page: http://www.eurostep.com http://www.share-a-space.com
Email: Rob.Bodington@eurostep.com
Phone: +44 (0)1454 270030
Mobile: +44 (0)7796 176 401

DISCLAIMER: ***SECURITY LABEL: NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED***   The information in this message is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee.  Access to this message by anyone else is unauthorised.  If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution of the message, or any action or omission taken by you in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.  Please immediately contact the sender if you have received this message in error. This e-mail originates from LSC Group. Registered in England & Wales No 2275471 Registered Office: Devonport Royal Dockyard, Devonport, Plymouth, PL1 4SG