[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [regrep] XQuery Support
**************************************************************************
Joseph M. Chiusano
Logistics Management Institute
2000 Corporate Ridge
McLean, VA 22102
Email:
jchiusano@lmi.org
Tel: 571.633.7722
**************************************************************************
-----Original Message-----
From: Joel Neu [mailto:jneu@vitria.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 1:04 PM
To: 'regrep@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: RE: [regrep] XQuery SupportIs the thought here to support specific XQueries related to Registry Services, or a more complete XQuery implementation?The latter seems quite cumbersome.Another thing to consider is the lack of UPDATE capabilities in XQuery 1.0 (Unless something has changed since the last time I looked at it).-joel-----Original Message-----
From: CHIUSANO, Joseph [mailto:JCHIUSANO@lmi.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 6:27 PM
To: 'regrep@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: RE: [regrep] XQuery SupportThanks David.
Does anyone have any other thoughts/views/suggestions that they'd like to contribute regarding this topic?
> **************************************************************************
> Joseph M. Chiusano
> Logistics Management Institute
> 2000 Corporate Ridge
> McLean, VA 22102
> Email: jchiusano@lmi.org
> Tel: 571.633.7722
> **************************************************************************
>
-----Original Message-----
From: David RR Webber - XMLGlobal [mailto:Gnosis_@compuserve.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 12:09 AM
To: CHIUSANO, Joseph
Cc: 'regrep@lists.oasis-open.org'
Subject: re: [regrep] XQuery Support
Message text written by "CHIUSANO, Joseph"
>
I'm hoping that we can start debating on the advantages/disadvantages of
introducing XQuery support into our architecture for V3.Respectfully Yours,
Joe
<<<<<<<<<<<Joe,
I can't be very objective here! Since we already have the XQuery support
built-in to our Registry implementation as the underlying query engine thisis a no-brainer for us.
So - of course - Yes - this should be an option for V3 implementations.
Based on our enduser feedback on XQuery and our database - it is
overwhelmingly positive. The XSLT folks aside - people coming to
XML from SQL find XQuery just what they need. That community is
what XQuery is designed for and it appears to be doing an excellent
job.Thanks, DW.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC