[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Raw chat log of 2009-05-05 telcon
Simon Holdsworth: Agenda Simon Holdsworth: 1. Opening Introductions Roll call Scribe assignment Top 10 on the scribe list: Tom Rutt Fujitsu Limited Jeff Mischkinsky Oracle Corporation Plamen Pavlov SAP AG Martin Chapman Oracle Corporation Piotr Przybylski IBM Anish Karmarkar Oracle Corporation Ashok Malhotra Oracle Corporation David Booz IBM Bryan Aupperle IBM Eric Johnson TIBCO Software Inc. Agenda bashing 2. Approval of the minutes from 30th April http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/32352/SCA%20Bindings%20minutes%202009-04-30.doc 3. Actions 20090211-4 [General] Write up HTTP binding use cases 20090311-2 [Editors] Update specs for new assembly namespace 20090312-1 [Editors] Update schemas in specs as per http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200903/msg00057.html 20090430-1 [David Booz] Submit updated proposal for issue BINDINGS-72 20090430-2 [Simon Nash] Produce two alternative proposals for resolution of BINDINGS-23, along the lines of options 1) and 2) in the 20090430 minutes 4. New Issues Please note, as per resolution on 9th October 2008, new issues received on the mailing list after Noon GMT 1st November can only be opened using the same voting rules as re-opening a closed issue (2/3 majority of a full TC vote) no new issues 5. Open Issue Summary/Schedule Discuss ownership/deferral of issues. Prioritise issue BINDINGS-72 Current schedule: Must have issues resolved by April 16th Public review draft available for TC comments April 23rd Public review draft vote April 30th Test assertions complete one month beyond PRD, test cases one month after that. Issues with proposed resolutions: 5 Issues with identified owner, no resolution: 0 Issues with no identified owner: 0 Survey outlook for issues with no proposed resolution (marked with * in this list) Simon Holdsworth: 48 (pri 3) Anish Karmarkar: 2 (pri 2) Eric Johnson: 54 (pri 1) Simon Nash: 23 (pri 1) David Booz: 72 (pri to be determined) 6. Conformance statement numbering Discuss/agree on the updates to the specs for issues 62, 63. http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/32159/sca-binding-jms-1.1-spec-cd02-issue62-rev2.doc http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/31989/sca-binding-jca-1.1-spec-cd02-issue63.doc 7. Open Issue Discussion http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-23 @wsdlElement definition needs clarification on "equivalent" and use of WSDL 2.0 constructs Raiser: Eric Johnson, owner: Simon Nash Priority: 1 Status: Awaiting updated proposed resolutions http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-54 Endpoint URI algorithm is unclear Raiser: Eric Johnson, owner: Eric Johnson Priority: 1 Status: Proposed resolution: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200903/msg00104.html Latest email: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200903/msg00107.html http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-2 How should SCA callback semantics be carried over Web Services? Raiser: Simon Nash, owner: Anish Karmarkar Priority: 2 Status: Proposed resolution: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200904/msg00012.html Latest email: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200904/msg00038.html http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-48 How are mayProvide intents on bindings satisfied Raiser: Ashok Malhotra, owner: Simon Holdsworth Priority: 3 Status: Proposed resolution: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200903/msg00005.html Latest email: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200903/msg00059.html http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-72 The qualifiers of the SOAP intent (1_1 and 1_2) should be defined to be mutually exclusive Raiser: David Booz, owner: David Booz Priority: TBC Status: Awaiting updated proposed resolution 7. AOB anish: Scribe: anish anish: Topic: Approval of the minutes from 30th April anish: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/32352/SCA%20Bindings%20minutes%202009-04-30.doc anish: Minutes approved w/o anish: Topic: Actions anish: 20090430-2 -- Done anish: Other AIs are still pending anish: Topic: Open Issue Summary/Schedule anish: SimonH: Should we prioritise issue BINDINGS-72? Do we need to resolve it before PR anish: SimonN: nice to have not must have anish: Dave: +1 anish: No alternate opinion anish: SimonH: this issue will be priority 2 anish: SimonH: 5 issues with proposals, 2 of them with priority 1 anish: Skipping agenda item # 6 Simon Holdsworth: Proposal for BINDINGS-23: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200905/msg00006.html anish: Topic: bindings-23 anish: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-23 @wsdlElement definition needs clarification on "equivalent" and use of WSDL 2.0 constructs anish: SimonN walks thru his proposal anish: closely related to issue 54 anish: SimonN: could be runtime issues that may prevent a port/binding from being used anish: SimonN: divided between refs and services anish: anish: can't reconcile between 1st must and 3rd must under open A anish: SimonH: make the 1st must a definition anish: SimonN: that words anish: Anish: does for me as well anish: SimonN: similar change needed for the reference porttion anish: s/porttion/portion/ anish: SimonH: for references we need a runtime MUST use one of those ports anish: SimonN: yes, agreed anish: anish: under port 3rd MUST, it says 'an endpoint' rather thatn 'the endpoint' anish: SimonN: that is deliberate, this intersects with issue 54 anish: ... 54 would clarify which endpoint would be used anish: SimonN: for the reference case, I need to add that the runtime must use the port to invoke the service anish: SimonN: for the 3rd bullet under /binding.ws/@wsdlElement, for the reference part, a similar sentence to say that the runtime must use the selected binding to invoke the service, has to be added anish: SimonN: need to say something about raising an error if the runtime cannot expose the port anish: SimonN: the last part (under "4") is identical to what was in the previous proposal anish: MikeE: still in favor of option B anish: SimonN: not too much overhead to keep working on both. Would like to continue the 2 options approach and when we have the final thing done we can vote on it anish: Action: SimonN to send a new proposal later today anish: SimonN: pl. send comments by email before the call anish: Topic: bindings-54 anish: http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BINDINGS-54 Endpoint URI algorithm is unclear anish: Eric: lean towards pushing this after issue 23 anish: ... but can perhaps work around it anish: MikeE: in that case we can push for a resolution between option A and B now anish: Topic: bindings-23 anish: Motion: m:MikeE s:Bryan Use option B in simon's proposal as a direction for resolution of issue 23 anish: Motion: m:MikeE s:Bryan Use option B in the proposal at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bindings/200905/msg00006.html as a direction for resolution of issue 23 anish: Amendment by Simon: replace option B with option A anish: no second to the amendment anish: SimonH: back to the main motion (unamended) anish: Motion passes 5-1-1 anish: SimonH: we'll go with option B anish: Eric: will revise proposal for issue 54 to take into account the directional resolution for issue 23 anish: Action: eric to provide a new proposal for issue 54 anish: Action: anish to provide a new inlined proposal for issue 2 which addresses optional conformance anish: meeting adjourned
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]