Formatted minutes of 2010-01-28 telcon

Minutes

Agenda -

1. Roll Call
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/sca-bpel/members/roster.php
2. Appointment of scribe
Scribe list attached below
3. Agenda bashing
4. Approval of 2010-01-21 minutes
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201001/msg00023.html
5. Review of Action Items
#0109 Mike Edwards - Send instructions for running the Assembly tests
#0115 Anish Karmarkar - Prepare an updated version of the proposal for issue 58 (rewriting section 2.1.1 to remove the nested-if)
#0117 Danny - Create a new issue and a proposal for the 0..1 case (related to issue 53)
#0122
Dieter - update the spec to remove "." from assertion lables
DONE
#0123
Sanjay - update the TA doc to sync up with the new CD rev
6. New Issues
None
7. Testing
Planned schedule -
Jan 21 - Revised specification draft (DONE)
Feb 4 - Update Test Assertion Document
Mar 4 - Test Case Creation
Mar 25 - Review and finalization of Test Cases
Apr 1 - Go for 2nd PR
a> Planning/volunteers for updating the test assertions document (DONE)
b> MikeE to send instructions for running the tests
Here is a rough break up of work for creating the test cases. More volunteers are appreciated.
Sanjay - SBL-TA-1001 to SBL-TA-2018
Anish - SBL-TA-3001 to SBL-TA-3026
8. Issue Discussion
a) Issue 58 - Need to add Capability to indicate that a PartnerLink should be ignored when introspecting the ComponentType of a BPEL process
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/BPEL-58
Email discussion: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/200909/msg00016.html
Awaiting a new proposal from Anish based on 2009-10-29 concall discussions
9. AOB
-----------------------------------------
Scribe list:
* Kand, Khanderao (Last scribed: 2009-07-23): 6
* Rowley, Mr Michael (Last scribed: 2009-08-06): 8
* Koenig, Mr Dieter (Last scribed: 2009-11-05): 13
* Malhotra, Mr Ashok (Last scribed: 2009-11-12): 14
* Andrabi, Mr. Najeeb (Last scribed: 2009-11-19): 13
* Chapman, Dr Martin (Last scribed: 2009-12-10): 11
* Patil, Sanjay (Last scribed: 2009-12-17): 1
* van der Rijn, Danny (Last scribed: 2010-01-07): 12
* Anish Karmarkar (Last scribed: 2010-01-14): 3
* Edwards, Mike (Last scribed: 2010-01-21): 2

Scribe: Dieter Koenig

Agenda bashing

Agenda approved

Approval of 2010-01-21 minutes

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201001/msg00023.html

Minutes approved

Resolution: Minutes of 2010-01-28 call located at http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201001/msg00023.html approved

Review of Action Items

#0109 Mike Edwards - Send instructions for running the Assembly tests
#0115 Anish Karmarkar - Prepare an updated version of the proposal for issue 58 (rewriting section 2.1.1 to remove the nested-if)
#0117 Danny - Create a new issue and a proposal for the 0..1 case (related to issue 53)
#0122
Dieter - update the spec to remove "." from assertion lables
DONE
#0123
Sanjay - update the TA doc to sync up with the new CD rev

#0109: work in progress

#0115: done: proposal sent - still needs an update: deferred to issue 58 discussion

#0117: done

#0122: done

#0123: work in progress

New Issues

issue 62

<anish>

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201001/msg00029.html

Motion (Danny) second (Anish): open BPEL-62 - passed unanimously

Resolution: issue 62 is now open

<anish>

proposal for 62 - http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201001/doc00000.doc

New agenda topic - discussion of issue 62

issue 62

current proposed: [SBPELXXXX] If the domain composite includes a wire for an optional reference, then the SCA-BPEL Runtime MUST configure the reference.

new proposed: [SBPELXXXX] If the domain composite includes a wire for *any* reference, then the SCA-BPEL Runtime MUST configure the reference.

Mike E:

editorial issue: the word "required", e.g., in "required reference" in 2.1.1, must be replaced as "required" is an RFC term

Mike E:

if SCA provides a wire then it *must* be made available to BPEL

Are there rules SCA-Assembly requires *every* C&I spec to follow?

(no general agreement in SCA-Assembly TC about such "meta-spec" rules)

Danny:

need rewording for resolution part (a)

Anish:

should distinguish 0..1 and 0..N cases

Proposal1: [SBPELXXXX] If the component configuration includes a wire for a 0..1 or 1..1 multiplicity reference, then the SCA-BPEL Runtime MUST configure the partner role of the partnerLink for that reference.

where would you put this text?

Mike E:

this text should appear at the end of 2.1.1 after #4. as a separate paragraph

Proposal1: [SBPELXXXX] If the component configuration includes a wire for a 0..n or 1..n multiplicity reference, then the SCA-BPEL Runtime MUST configure the sca-bpel:multiRefFrom variable associated with the partnerLink associated with that reference.

<anish>

wire(s)

serviceReferenceList:
<xsd:element name="serviceReferenceList">
<xsd:complexType>
<xsd:sequence>
<xsd:element ref="sref:service-ref"
minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" />
</xsd:sequence>
</xsd:complexType>
</xsd:element>

[SBPELXXXX] For a 0..n or 1..n multiplicity reference, then the SCA-BPEL Runtime MUST configure the sca-bpel:multiRefFrom variable associated with the partnerLink associated with that reference, using a serviceReferenceList which contains 1 service-ref element for each configured target for the reference.

Resolution part (b) is in new section 3.5

Discussion continued on mailing list, using a proposal updated with the two statements above for section 2.1.1

Action: Mike E. will create the updated proposal

Issue 58

<anish>

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/sca-bpel/201001/msg00032.html

See proposal submitted by Anish (link above)

is that violin in the background?

maybe we can include a summary in an appendix

it would be nice to have it all in one place
DannyvanderRijn apologies. have to drop for another meeting

I have to drop for two meetings in parallel
Martin C only one call now as bindings was cancelled

Discussion on 58 continued on mailing list and the next call

TA document

Sanjay:

test assertions document ready for review

9. AOB

Action: Anish to produce test assertions for SBPEL2023

Meeting adjourned

Schreiber diagnostics output

[Delete this section before publishing the minutes]

final validation: Title not specified, default title 'OASIS SCA-BPEL TC...' was assumed

statistics: Schreiber found 132 input lines

edits: Schreiber found the following text-edit commands:

edits: Line 149: DannyvanderRijn: s/partnerLink variable/partner role of the partnerLink/

citation-detection-irc1: Line 4: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'

citation-detection-irc1: Line 12: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'

citation-detection-irc1: Line 49: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'http'

citation-detection-irc1: Line 50: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'Email discussion'

citation-detection-irc1: Line 56: Check for possible unrecognized nick 'Scribe list'

command-scribe: Line 74: Dieter Koenig recognized

command-scribe: Schreiber detected that this section was scribed online

edit-substitute: command on line 149 succeeded, changed line 147 from 'partnerLink variable' to 'partner role of the partnerLink'

sca-bpel message

- DRAFT -

OASIS SCA-BPEL TC

28 JAN 2010

Attendees

Contents

Action Items

Resolutions

Minutes

Agenda bashing

Approval of 2010-01-21 minutes

Review of Action Items

New Issues

issue 62

Issue 58

TA document

Schreiber diagnostics output