Re: [security-services] Proposed Agenda SSTC Concall, September 25, 2007

["Tom Scavo" <trscavo@gmail.com>]

On 9/25/07, Tom Scavo <trscavo@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9/25/07, Hal Lockhart <hlockhar@bea.com> wrote:
> >
> > 3.2 Docs pending public review
> >
> > Pending 15 Day Review
> > *SAML V2.0 Attribute Sharing Profile for X.509 Authentication-Based
> > Systems (CD 04)
> >
> > The following are needed.
> >
> > 1. The dates of the original 60-day review, including a link to the
> > announcement
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200605/msg00001.html
>
> > 2. The comment resolution log of any reported issues
> >
> > 3. A change-marked copy of the spec noting the differences from the
> > version submitted for the 60-day public review.
>
> This document went through five (5) working drafts between CD-02 and
> CD-03, so a diff would be meaningless.  I wonder if we should we
> submit this document for 60-day public review instead of 15-day public
> review?
>
> The wiki has been updated with more information about this document:
>
> http://wiki.oasis-open.org/security/SstcSamlX509AuthnAttribProfile
>
> > Pending 60 Day Review
> > *SAML V2.0 Deployment Profiles for X.509 Subjects (CD 02)
> >
> > Need work on conformance sections:
> >
> > SAML V2.0 Attribute Sharing Profile for X.509 Authentication-Based
> > Systems - contains no conformance section
>
> Yes it does.  Please see section 5 of CD-02:
>
> http://wiki.oasis-open.org/security/SstcSaml2X509ProfilesDeploy

Oh sorry, I made a mistake on this last point.  The Attribute Sharing
Profile does in fact include a conformance section (but the above
reference is incorrect).  Please see section 6 of CD-04:

http://wiki.oasis-open.org/security/SstcSamlX509AuthnAttribProfile

Tom