Re: [soa-rm] [issue:structure] draft 07, sect 2, line 201, Figure 2-1

[Michael Stiefel <development@reliablesoftware.com>]

Since I think since semantics is ubiquitous, I do not like 3 or 4. However, 
if you want to show that Service Description is composed of Policy, 
Contract, and Data Model,  then 3 shows that better than 2.

Michael

At 10:32 PM 5/19/2005, Duane Nickull wrote:
>I got inspired to try a few new things with a hybrid of the stack and the 
>mind map.
>
>There are a few for your perusal.
>
>CoreRM 2 is my favorite - we can just leave out semantics in the diagram 
>since they are ubiquitous and state in text that semantics are a core 
>component required to make SOA work.  This is very common with things that 
>are omnipresent in architectural diagrams.
>Please ignore the interface at the bottom.  It is probably not a good idea.
>
>CoreRM3 is a hybrid that uses the stack convention with embedded 
>elements.  Semantics are specifically called out as a key aspect of 
>service description.
>
>Core RM 4 is also not bad - I placed semantics as a layer overlapping the 
>specific items it affects. Again - ignore the lower red box.
>
>Comments?
>
>
>Duane
>
>>>
>
>
>
>