[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: [ubl-ndrsc] Agenda for 23 October 2002 UBL NDR SC meeting
Agenda for 23 October 2002 UBL NDR SC meeting PLEASE NOTE: Eve has discovered that she can't attend this meeting. Can Mavis or another person serve as a chair pro tem? (Eduardo, please use the host code.) The NDR SC will meet by phone on Wednesday, 23 October 2002: http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?year=2002&mon=10&day=23&hour=15&min=30&sec=0 Please use the following dial-in information: Toll-free (from the U.S.) +1 888 422 7141 International access/caller-paid +1 334 832 4208 Participant code 242-630 1. Roll call (Michael G., Jessica, Mark, Eve regrets) 2. Acceptance of minutes of previous meeting 16 October 2002 http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-ndrsc/200210/msg00024.html corrected in this post: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-ndrsc/200210/msg00025.html 3. Adoption of agenda 4. Review action items and status PLEASE NOTE: Try to send a status update to the list before the meeting, so that this agenda item can go more quickly. Paul: - Do an analysis of the "XML Constructs" chapter to figure out the XML/XSD-specificity question at a finer granularity, and make any editorial suggestions based on the analysis. Mavis: - Turn the free normative text in the NDR document into isolated, numbered rules. Mavis and Bill: - Get together offline to move the appropriate modnamver paper content into the NDR document. 40% Complete. ECD 22 October. Eve: - Compile a list of the supplementary compenents and their definitions on a per-CCT basis. 30% Complete. ECD 23 October. - Ask the Sun XML community to analyze the seriousness of the fragment processing problem with local elements. Docket: (See minutes of last meeting for details) http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-ndrsc/200210/msg00024.html 5. Local vs. global details See Eve's XML 2002 paper for a proposal for how to turn the decision into perl script actions: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-ndrsc/200210/zip00002.zip Relevant passage is: ======== * Object classes (aggregate BIEs) are turned into complex type definitions and element declarations that are directly bound to these types. * Properties (association and basic BIEs) are turned into element references in the content models of the object class complex types. If a suitable element declaration was not already created above, it is created now. (There may be multiple elements with the same type but different names.) * The properties are bound to types indicated by the relevant representation terms. Where a representation term corresponds to one of the prescribed CCTs, its corresponding XSD type is used. Where a representation term corresponds to an object class (aggregate BIE), that complex type is used instead. * A combination of the definition of the generic element-as-object-class (the original declaration, associated with a type) and the specific element-as-property-of-a-higher-object-class (the reference in a content model) provides a complete view of the meaning. ======== What are the gotchas in this? Can Gunther use this as is, and let us know of issues? This probably affects assembly since it creates elements and attaches BIE definitions that can be referenced by assemblers of new message types. 6. Take tentative decision on containership - Review writeup in the 1-4 October minutes - Does anything need to be added to the NDR document? 7. Work through other NDR document "flesh out" issues 8. Next meeting topics October 30 (Eve regrets; Mark will cover; can Mark do agenda?) November 6 November 13 8. Adjourn -- Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 Sun Microsystems NEW!!! cell +1 781 354 9441 Web Technologies and Standards eve.maler @ sun.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC