Re: [ubl-security] Where to go from here - Final proposal?

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

At 2010-08-28 15:37 +0200, Andrea Caccia wrote:
>Il giorno 28/ago/2010, alle ore 14.58, G. Ken Holman ha scritto:
>
> > I'm willing to accept the above and I can commit to having it 
> changed (if you accept my minor tweaks in names) for Jon for Monday 
> morning if others can quickly endorse Andrea's suggestion with my 
> XML- and UBL-related changes.
>
>I agree on all your proposed changes, thank you for fixing the 
>remaining issues.

Thank you, Andrea ... one unanswered question I asked:  did you want 
"0..1" or "0..n" for <ds:Signature> under <sig:SignatureInformation>?

. . . . . . . . . Ken

--
XSLT/XQuery training:   after http://XMLPrague.cz 2011-03-28/04-01
Vote for your XML training:   http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/i/
Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc
Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal