[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes of Pacific UBL TC call 17|18 January 2005
MINUTES OF PACIFIC UBL TC MEETING
00H30 - 02H30 UTC TUESDAY 18 JANUARY 2005
ATTENDANCE
Jon Bosak (chair)
Micah Dubinko
Betty Harvey
Tim McGrath
Sylvia Webb
STANDING ITEMS
Additions to the calendar (http://ibiblio.org/bosak/ubl/calendar.htm)
None.
Liaison reports
None.
Subcommittee reports
SSC (SylviaW): Met last week; reorganizing and focusing on
1.1; nothing significant to report.
HISC (MicahD): Had a call last week; think we have a good
game plan.
Team reports
None.
ISSUES FOR DISCUSSION THIS MEETING
Questions from Altova:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200501/msg00022.html
Regarding file extensions: The question implies that there is
just one UBL doctype, which is not the case. We used ".xml"
for our sample instances, and this should probably be the
default.
Regarding document templates: Again, we have several doctypes
in UBL, not just one. Altova probably wants something similar
to our sample instances, but none of them (indeed, probably no
real-world instance) contains all of the possible elements. We
think something like the small-business profile that StephenG
and GKenH have been working on is what would be most
appropriate for this.
Regarding the catalog: We believe that Altova is referring to
the SGML Open catalog, which associates public identifiers with
physical locations (and therefore allows Altova to ship just
the URLs, not the schemas themselves).
JonB to put Altova in contact with StephenG regarding the
small-business profile.
JonB to point Altova to the canonical schema locations on the
OASIS site.
CONTENT WORK SESSION
The work session continued under the direction of TimM. BettyH
has recorded the outcomes in the content issues list; they are
noted here for people following this through the minutes. All
of these items relate to requests from the Swedish Association
of Local Authorities.
With regard to DeliveryInformation, we will seek more
information (is this equivalent to existing DeliveryTerms?).
Agreed: We accept InvoicingPeriod as a new ASBIE in Invoice
with cardinality of 0..1.
Agreed: We accept the proposed "InitialInvoiceDocumentReference"
as a new ASBIE in Invoice with cardinality of 0..n, but we do
not accept the proposed name; we have tentatively named this
new ASBIE "PreviousInvoiceDocumentReference" pending further
discussion.
Agreed: We accept the proposed "RequisitionistDocumentReference"
as a new BBIE in InvoiceLine with cardinality of 0..1, but we
have named this new BBIE "RequisitionistIdentifier".
Regarding the proposed AllowanceChargeBaseAmount, we think we
have all the information we need from the proposers; now we
need to assess the taxation reporting implications outside of
Europe.
Regarding the proposed TaxCurrencyTaxAmount, we wonder whether
this applies outside of Europe; we will study the IDA analysis
to gain a better understanding of the requirements.
JonB to put TimM in contact with the IDA/CEN invoicing project.
The Pacific TC call will occur as scheduled next week, with the
first part of the meeting devoted to a discussion of the draft
multilingual UBL data dictionary:
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200501/msg00023.html
Jon Bosak
Chair, OASIS UBL TC
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]