Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH v3] virtio-net: Fix and update VIRTIO_NET_F_NOTF_COAL feature

[Alvaro Karsz <alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com>]

> > +\begin{note}
> > +In general, these commands are best-effort: spurious notifications could still arrive.
> > +\end{note}
>
> This is quite vague. How about:
>
> The behaviour of the device in response to these commands is
> best-effort: the device may generate notifications more frequently than
> specified, for example after less than \field{max_packets} packets have
> been processed or less than \field{usecs} usecs time has elapsed.
>

On second thought, this may be a little confusing.
The device can send a notification before processing max_packets
packets, if usecs elapsed (and vice versa).
So it should be "less than \field{max_packets} packets have been
processed AND less than \field{usecs} usecs ..."

How about dropping the example?