RE: [PATCH v16 03/11] content: Rename confusing queue_notify_data and vqn names

[Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>]

> From: David Edmondson <david.edmondson@oracle.com>
> Sent: Thursday, May 4, 2023 10:28 AM

> >  \begin{description}
> > -\item [vqn] VQ number to be notified.
> > +\item [vq_index_config_data] Either virtqueue index or device supplied
> > +      queue notification config data corresponding to a virtqueue.
> 
> vq_index_config_data doesn't exist.
> 
> Given that this is an anonymous union, perhaps:
> 
> \item [vq_index or vq_notif_config_data] Either ...

> >  \drivernormative{\paragraph}{Available Buffer Notifications}{Virtio
> > Transport Options / Virtio Over PCI Bus / PCI-specific Initialization And Device
> Operation / Available Buffer Notifications} -If VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA
> has been negotiated:
> > +
> > +If VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA is not negotiated, the driver
> > +notification MUST be a 16-bit notification.
> > +
> > +If VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA is negotiated, the driver notification
> > +MUST be a 32-bit notification.
> 
> The above two should be inside itemize?

Both suggestions look good to me.
Given rest of the patches are reviewed and it is already v16, I think I can cover them right after this in editorial changes after merging this.
This way the majority of the work of this series and subsequent patches doesn't need to wait another week.