[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH 2/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status
> From: Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com> > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 12:09 PM > > There is parent object. > > There is VQ which you propose to do SUSPEND_RESET of the parent virtio > device which is already SUSPENDED. > that is why we plan to implement a new feature bit to control this behavior. > It does not matter adding a feature bit when the semantics itself is wrong. > However, in next version, as MST suggested, I will forbid resetting vqs after > SUSPEND. Ok. That is good. I got confused with above proposed bit.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]