Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH 2/5] virtio: introduce SUSPEND bit in device status

["Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>]

On 9/18/2023 2:46 PM, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > From: Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> > Sent: Monday, September 18, 2023 12:09 PM
> > > There is parent object.
> > > There is VQ which you propose to do SUSPEND_RESET of the parent virtio
> > device which is already SUSPENDED.
> > that is why we plan to implement a new feature bit to control this behavior.
> It does not matter adding a feature bit when the semantics itself is wrong.
>
> > However, in next version, as MST suggested, I will forbid resetting vqs after
> > SUSPEND.
> Ok. That is good.
> I got confused with above proposed bit.
OK, lets at least close this one