re ebxml

[Terry Allen <tallen@sonic.net>]

Eduardo wrote (and experienced a bounce because of problems at
	sonic.net):
| Terry Allen wrote:
| > 
| > It occurred to me after the call that I believe I've been told
| I believe this is still under discussion, if not contention ;-)
| 
| > that ebxml is operating under CEFACT rules.  If so, it isn't using
| > the OASIS process and we don't need to worry about it unless OASIS
| > thinks the work product will become OASIS standard(s).  Can we
| > ascertain what the rules for ebxml are and what OASIS's expectations
| > for the outcome are?
| 
| But wouldn't the pipelined process allow for the "standardization"
| of specifications developed outside of the Oasis process, if it
| came to that?

Yes, my question is whether that is what ebxml is expecting; this
may be off-topic.

Secondarily, now that I'm sensitized to R, I wonder about ebxml
committee rules because so far the committee I'm working in has
proceded in, um, the way we used to ....


regards, Terry