[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Delicate subject: changing the attendance requirements
Interesting question. I admit I'd not thought about OASIS rules in bylaws that (under RROR) can be amended by the TCs. So (while your question "Do people think it's a good idea to mess with the attendance requirements at all?") is certainly relevant, another one might be: what would the disposition of the PAC (and OASIS) be if we heard from a TC Chair: "Our TC does not think the OASIS profess rules on this point are workable, so for the next year, we are having a different rule for our main TC and all sibcommittees: 'A quorum shall be 20% of the members'. That will help ensure that we get our work done." -Robin -------------------------------------------------------------------------- On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Eve L. Maler wrote: > My TC is huge (nearly 80 people), and a lot of the work is getting done at > subcommittee meetings. I'd like to find a way to ease the good-standing > penalties on members who are very active on subgroups, and who occasionally > can't make the whole-TC meetings because they're traveling or > whatever. However, I don't want to endanger quorum at the whole-TC meetings. > > As I understand it, the TC can adopt a standing rule that overrides the > OASIS rules (and RROR), though the requirements for passage of such motion > are slightly higher than for regular motions; adopting a rule easing > attendance requirements would fall into this category. Do people think > it's a good idea to mess with the attendance requirements at all? > > If so, what might be a suitably mild revision? I'm thinking merely of a > small revision to paragraph 6(a). It currently reads: > > "A member shall be warned by mail from the chair of the TC upon failure to > attend two out of every three successive meetings of the TC. Membership > shall be terminated if the member fails to attend the next meeting > following transmittal of the warning." > > It could read: > > "A member shall be warned by mail from the chair of the TC upon failure to > attend two out of every three successive meetings of the TC. If the member > has not attended two out of three meetings of the subcommittees on which > the member sits, or if the member does not sit on any subcommittees, > membership shall be terminated if the member fails to attend the next > committee meeting following transmittal of the warning. If the member sits > on one or more subcommittees and has attended two out of three meetings of > those subcommittees, membership shall be terminated if the member fails to > attend one of the next two committee meetings following transmittal of the > warning." > > What say you all? > > Eve > -- > Eve Maler +1 781 442 3190 > Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center eve.maler @ east.sun.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > "unsubscribe" in the body to: workprocess-request@lists.oasis-open.org >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC