RE: [ws-rx] PR Issue 40: MakeConnection Policy assertion does not indicate a Requirement

["Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com>]

Wouldn't that conflict with the wsmc:MakeConnection message?

 

- gp

---

From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 11:45 AM
To: Gilbert Pilz
Cc: Doug Davis; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: RE: [ws-rx] PR Issue 40: MakeConnection Policy assertion does not indicate a Requirement

How about just MakeConnection

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
phone: +1 508 377 9295

"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com> wrote on 03/01/2007 12:32:17 PM:

> Shouldn't the name of the assertion be changed from MCSupported to
> MCRequired? Seems really confusing otherwise . . .
>  
> - gp
>
> From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 11:45 AM
> To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx] PR Issue 40: MakeConnection Policy assertion
> does not indicate a Requirement

>
> If it helps, I've attached a pdf file with the proposed changes
> (Tom's + my minor tweak) for PR040 as they would appear in the MC
> spec.  I'm hoping the lack of discussion means people are ok with
> this.  If not, please speak up as it would make the editor's job
> easier to know that people will disagree with this proposal.
>
> thanks
> -Doug
>
>  

smime.p7s