Re: [ws-tx] - Re: Groups - New Action Item #0058 Review use of RFC 2119keywords ...

[Ian Robinson <ian_robinson@uk.ibm.com>]

I agree that the BA text is out of step with the AT text and should be
changed to match the AT text (including the MUST).

Regards,
Ian



                                                                           
             "Monica J.                                                    
             Martin"                                                       
             <Monica.Martin@su                                          To 
             n.com>                    Ian Robinson/UK/IBM@IBMGB, Thomas   
             Sent by:                  Freund <tjfreund@us.ibm.com>        
             Monica.Martin@sun                                          cc 
             .com                      "ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org"        
                                       <ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org>        
                                                                   Subject 
             27/10/2006 22:41          Re: [ws-tx] - Re: Groups - New      
                                       Action Item #0058 Review use of RFC 
                                       2119 keywords ...                   
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




Update, related to #097 and AI#0058, have you also noted a need for
consistency with this statement that also exists in WS-AT:

WS-AT, pr-01, line 492

    492 Protocol faults raised by a Coordinator or Participant during
    the processing of a notification message are
    493 terminal notifications and MUST be composed using the same
    mechanisms as other terminal notification
    494 messages.

WS-BA, cd-03, line 517

    517 Protocol faults raised by a Coordinator or Participant during
    the processing of a notification message
    518 defined in this specification are composed using the same
    mechanisms, described in this section, as
    519 other terminal notification messages.

This comment was not included in those from you or Ian. Thanks.

>Ian Robinson wrote: Tom, you subsequently wrote:
>Update --- add,
>
>"may" to "MAY", line 347
>"must" to "MUST", line 322
>
>I agree with all your comments with the following exceptions:
>
>3. Change "should" to "SHOULD", lines 282(?)  ==> I think this ought to
>remain lowercse.
>3. Change "should" to "SHOULD", lines 324 (x2)   ==> I think these ought
to
>be MUST. I made a similar comment [1] for WS-AT
>
>[1]
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/email/archives/200610/msg00052.html

>
>

>Proposed RFC 2119 keyword changes to WS-BA CD03
>1. Change "must" to "MUST", lines 179, 210 (NB: Lines 217, 552 suggest
>changing "must know" to "knows")
>2. Change "MUST not" to "MUST NOT", lines 235, 268, 348
>3. Change "should" to "SHOULD", lines 234, 240, 260, 266, 273, 277, 278,
>279, 282(?), 283, 284, 286, 324 (x2), 338, 345, 353, 514
>4. Change "may" to "MAY", lines 205, 211, 243, 245, 248, 250, 252, 254,
>261, 268, 288, 290, 292, 294, 296, 299 (NB: Line 308 suggest changing
>"might" to "MAY")

>
>

>action item: OASIS Web Services Transaction (WS-TX) TC member,
>Dr Ian Robinson has created a new action item.
>Number: #0058
>Description: Review use of RFC 2119 keywords ...
>Owner: Mr Thomas Freund
>Due: 27 Oct 2006
>
>Comments:
>View Details:
>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-tx/members/action_item.php?action_item_id=1720

>
>