RE: [ws-tx] NEW Issue (Errata): Update WS-Policy reference description

["Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>]

Monica,

I support the suggestion from Ram to update to 1.2 since this is just correcting a reference, with no 
implication to update to the "latest version". 

Martin.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Monica.Martin@Sun.COM [mailto:Monica.Martin@Sun.COM] 
>Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 4:57 PM
>To: Ram Jeyaraman
>Cc: ws-tx@lists.oasis-open.org
>Subject: Re: [ws-tx] NEW Issue (Errata): Update WS-Policy 
>reference description
>
>
>Ram Jeyaraman wrote:
>
>> Currently, the reference to WS-Policy in the WS-Coordination, WS-AT
>> and WS-BA specifications state:
>>
>> *[WSPOLICY] *Web Services Policy Framework (WS-Policy), 118
>> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy, VeriSign, Microsoft, 
>> Sonic 119 Software, IBM, BEA Systems, SAP, September 2004.
>>
>> ‘September 2004’ should be replaced with ‘March 2006’ as follows:
>>
>> *[WSPOLICY] *Web Services Policy Framework (WS-Policy), 118
>> http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/ws/2004/09/policy, VeriSign, Microsoft, 
>> Sonic 119 Software, IBM, BEA Systems, SAP, March 2006.
>>
>Ram, can you explain the rationale for this reference rather than the 
>current Candidate Recommendation version for W3C WS-Policy, see: 
>http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/CR-ws-policy-20070330/. Since we effectively 
>only use the simple policy assertion and wsp:Optional, and 
>this has been 
>maintained in WS-Policy, wouldn't the new version apply? Or, if we 
>choose, the progressed specifications? Thanks.
>
>