[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [wsbpel] Issue 110 - Rough draft for proposal to vote
I'm unclear as to what connotations you refer to. The invoke activity can be legally used with two and only two MEPs in WSDL. The first is commonly referred to as a one-way. The second is commonly referred to as a request/response. The 'one-way' name doesn't provide any obvious inspiration for naming the variable that holds the outgoing message. So I instead took my inspiration from request/response which consists of a request and a response message. Therefore I do not believe that the change has any connotation besides aligning our language with WSDL which is the foundation of BPEL. Yaron Danny van der Rijn wrote: > maybe not semantics, but connotations, which i'd like to avoid changing. > > Ugo Corda wrote: > >>>this ties our semantics too closely to HTTP-like semantics >>> >>> >>I don't think that Yaron's new text changes in any way the current >>semantics. >> >> >>Ugo >> >>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php. >> >> >> >> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of > the OASIS TC), go to > http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php. >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]