Re: [wsbpel] Issue 110 - Rough draft for proposal to vote

["Yaron Y. Goland" <ygoland@bea.com>]

I'm unclear as to what connotations you refer to. The invoke activity 
can be legally used with two and only two MEPs in WSDL. The first is 
commonly referred to as a one-way. The second is commonly referred to as 
a request/response.

The 'one-way' name doesn't provide any obvious inspiration for naming 
the variable that holds the outgoing message. So I instead took my 
inspiration from request/response which consists of a request and a 
response message.

Therefore I do not believe that the change has any connotation besides 
aligning our language with WSDL which is the foundation of BPEL.

		Yaron

Danny van der Rijn wrote:

>   maybe not semantics, but connotations, which i'd like to avoid changing.
> 
> Ugo Corda wrote:
> 
>>>this ties our semantics too closely to HTTP-like semantics 
>>>    
>>>
>>I don't think that Yaron's new text changes in any way the current
>>semantics.
>>
>>
>>Ugo
>>
>>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>>
>>
>>  
>>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of 
> the OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsbpel/members/leave_workgroup.php. 
>