Re: [wsn] latest draft of WS-BaseN

[James Bryce Clark <jamie.clark@oasis-open.org>]

     Hello all.  Let me mention, informally, that there is a strong chance 
that in the new year we will change the canonical use of URis at docs. 
oasis-open.org, to remove or deprecate inclusion of the "/YYYY/MM/" 
elements.  Official announcement to follow.  (Of course if someone has 
created a dependency at an old location, it's my expectation that we would 
support it  by keeping it there, nonnormatively, as well.)
     This is not a 100% sure thing yet, but likely and in process, so I 
thought it wise to note it in connection with your plans to use the space, 
below.   Best regards  JBC

At 07:34 AM 12/8/2004, David Hull wrote:
>Tom Maguire wrote:
>>A  couple of issues/questions related to the latest draft:
>>* * *
>>232
>>
>>   it MUST contain the URI
>> 
>>http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsn/yyyy/mm/wsn-WS-BaseNotification-1.3-draft-01.wsdl/Notify
>>
>>   for wsrf the SOAP URI is the default: namespace, portType name, 
>> message name.  So I think this should be
>> 
>>http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsn/yyyy/mm/wsn-WS-BaseNotification-1.3-draft-01.wsdl/NotificationConsumer/Notify
>>   Since the input message does not have a name I'm unsure what the last
>>   part (message name) of that should be.
>>
>>   270, 411, 520, 558, 613, 655, 667, 697, 728, 832, 850, 870, 895, 916,
>>   941, 961, 986
>>   same as line 232
>>
>>* * *
>
>~   James Bryce Clark
>~   Director, Standards Development, OASIS
>~   +1 978 667 5115 x 203 central office