Re: [wsn] latest draft of WS-BaseN

[David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>]

Tom Maguire wrote:

>
>
>A couple of issues/questions related to the latest draft:
>
>
>   109
>
>   The NotificationProducer ensures that notifications will be delivered to
>   the NotificationConsumer as requested in the Subscribe request, or
>   returns a fault if the subscription cannot be handled.
>
>   I think the highlighted statement above is too strong.  The question I
>   have is what is definition of 'delivered'?  Does it mean just message
>   request sent?
>  
>
"Delivered" is too strong.  I think the proper semantic is that the NP 
will attempt to send each message to the notification endpoint.

 This opens up questions of reliable delivery, which we need to address.

>   232
>
>   it MUST contain the URI
>   http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsn/yyyy/mm/wsn-WS-BaseNotification-1.3-draft-01.wsdl/Notify
>
>   for wsrf the SOAP URI is the default: namespace, portType name, message
>   name.  So I think this should be
>   http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsn/yyyy/mm/wsn-WS-BaseNotification-1.3-draft-01.wsdl/NotificationConsumer/Notify
>   Since the input message does not have a name I'm unsure what the last
>   part (message name) of that should be.
>
>   270, 411, 520, 558, 613, 655, 667, 697, 728, 832, 850, 870, 895, 916,
>   941, 961, 986
>   same as line 232
>
>   807
>
>   whether notifications will be delivered
>
>
>   Same problem with 'delivered'
>
>
>
>
>
>A few issues/comments unrelated to the edits in the latest draft:
>
>
>
>   524
>
>   /wsnt:SubscriptionReference/wsa:Address
>
>      wsa:Address should be wsa:EndpointReference
>
>   527
>
>   /wsnt:SubscriptionReference/wsrl:CurrentTime
>
>      should not be /wsnt:SubscriptionReference should only be
>      wsrl:CurrentTime
>
>   532
>
>   /wsnt:SubscriptionReference/wsrl:TerminationTime
>
>      same as 527
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Tom
>
>
>
>
>
>Problems cannot be solved at the same level of awareness that created
>them.  —Albert Einstein
>T o m   M a g u i r e
>
>STSM, On Demand Architecture
>Poughkeepsie, NY  12601
>
>
>                                                                           
>             Steve                                                         
>             Graham/Raleigh/IB                                             
>             M@IBMUS                                                    To 
>                                       wsn@lists.oasis-open.org            
>             12/07/2004 04:06                                           cc 
>             PM                                                            
>                                                                   Subject 
>                                       [wsn] latest draft of WS-BaseN      
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>                                                                           
>
>
>
>
>
>I posted [1] draft 01c of WS-BaseN version 1.3.  This reflects consensus
>between David Hull and I on the resolutions to the following issues:
>
>
>WSN 1,7, 2.7, 2.13, 2.14, 2.15, 2.24 and WSN2.17 revisited (Sanjay: this is
>an AI David Hull had, closing WSN 2.17).
>
>
>We would like a third set of eyes to verify execution of these resolutions
>and recommend that these issues be closed.  Jem, may we impose upon you
>again?
>
>sgg
>
>[1]http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/wsn/download.php/10478/wsn-WS-BaseNotification-1.3-draft-01c.doc
>
>
>++++++++
>Steve Graham
>(919)254-0615 (T/L 444)
>STSM, On Demand Architecture
>Member, IBM Academy of Technology
><Soli Deo Gloria/>
>++++++++
>
>  
>