[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Minutes 9 June 2016 TC meeting
Time: 4:30 PM EST (-0400 GMT) Tel: 1-712-775-7031 Access Code: 620-103-760 Minutes for 9 June 2016 TC Meeting I. Roll Call & Minutes Attendance Voting Members Hal Lockhart (Co-Chair) Bill Parducci (Co-Chair) Rich Levinson Steven Legg Martin Smith Members Richard Hill Remon Sinnenma Quorum: YES. 5 of 6 (83%) per Oasis site Approve Minutes 26 May 2016 (updated) APPROVED UNANIMOUSLY II. Administrivia Additions to Agenda Martin: IDESG Standards Registry inclusion Hal: Consensus around applicable policy list Recap of Document Status https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201605/msg00020.html Hal: {briefly reviewed status} Martin: I learned that moving these to standards qualifies them for ITU-T adoption. Hal: Yes, Oasis has a relationship with ITU Errata editor https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201606/msg00001.html Errata Starter docs https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201606/msg00003.html Hal: Richard has volunteered to be the Editor. Some of the errata in the wiki should be usable with limited clean-up. Richard: I will review the documents from Oasis Admin. Hal: This process is similar to creating an Oasis Standard. Nomination of XACML 3.0 and Profiles for IDESG Standards Registry https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/xacml/201606/msg00002.html Hal: The UN document associated with my post today outlines some possible use cases. The Blockhain reference is unlikely to have a use case that intersects with XACML. Martin: I am requesting comment/input from the TC on the draft IDESG Nomination Form (posted as attachment on 6/9/2016 in TC list) for the XACML Core Spec to be accepted into the IDESG Standards Registry. I particularly need for input where I put [??] in the draft. Martin: I recommended that we submit two nominations forms: one for the Core Spec and another grouping together all XACML Profiles the TC would like to recommend for inclusion in the Registry. I believe that the IDESG Standards Committee would prefer not to have to process separate forms for each Profile since they are reviewing the nominations on only a few criteria rather than the details of each proposed standard or profile. Hal: I think it would be best to submit this per spec. I am not sure if each must be a Specification. Martin: It is my understanding that a Profile at the level of Committee Spec or above is eligible for inclusion in the IDESG Standards Register. Bill: Is this a workload issue on their end? Hal: Given details that are unique to each Specification that may make that a wash. Hal: I'd like to suggest that we begin a discussion on the List to determine which specs we would like to nominate. {general consensus} Applicable Policy List Contents Hal: I think this will be the most challenging issue to solve with the Errata. I originally posted something, that Steven expanded upon. I would like to take another run at this after giving it some more thought. Borderless Cyber Europe Hal: If anyone is interested, this will be happening in the beginning of September. "Early Bird" pricing ends June 15. One of the key topics surrounds a threat intelligence exchange. There will be a similar event called Asia later in the year. meeting adjourned.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]