bt-spec message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [bt-spec] BTP Issue 58 : Minor editorials
- From: Peter Furniss <peter.furniss@choreology.com>
- To: bt-spec@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2001 13:13:31 +0000
Some
of Mark's corrections were also picked up by Alex (issue 12) and Gordon (issue
14)
I
propose we accept the editorials (leaving the items identified as separate
issues for separate consideration), with the following
variations:
line
434 : Gordon's text preferred
line
580 : prefer to make the text: "an Atomic Superior will apply the same decision to all of its
Inferiors; a Cohesive Superior may apply confirm to some Inferiors and cancel to
others"
line
880: prefer Alex's text
line
910 : prefer to make it ".. to supply a new address or set of addresses to
replace the old one." rather than " .. a new
address(es) ...
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From:
BTP issues maintainer [mailto:peter.furniss@choreology.com]
Sent: 08
November 2001 15:15
To:
bt-spec@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [bt-spec] BTP Issue 58 : Minor
editorials
This issue has been added to the BTP
issue list
BTP Issue 58 : Minor editorials
Submitter: Mark Little,
HP
Category: minor editorial
Submitter's identification:
#25
Description:
Word
document (1.5Mb) is a marked up version of the spec. with several spelling
mistakes and missing words. It also has many of the issues I've just sent you
as comments, just in case. (issues now numbered 32 - 56, prf))
<snip>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC