RE: [bt-spec] URI issue subquestion #1

[Peter Furniss <peter.furniss@choreology.com>]

Our answer to the question below is yes too, though its good to be sure that
your proposal is not supposed to be reducing this functionality.

Peter

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Little [mailto:mark_little@hp.com]
> Sent: 01 February 2002 10:12
> To: Peter Furniss; BT - spec
> Cc: Jim Webber
> Subject: [bt-spec] URI issue subquestion #1
>
>
> Rather than continue to go round and round the same loop maybe we should
> break this discussion up into individual points. Based on the group's
> answers to each we may then find that it simply isn't necessary
> to continue,
> or vice versa.
>
> So, on that note, here's the first point:
>
> Do we think it is necessary to support the migration of entities?
>
> Our answer is yes and I would assume that that is the committees view too,
> but it would be useful to see.
>
> Next question to follow.
>
> Mark.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> SENDER : Dr. Mark Little, Architect (Transactions), HP Arjuna Labs
> PHONE  : +44 191 206 4538, FAX : +44 191 206 4203
> EMAIL  : mark@arjuna.com | mark_little@hp.com
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
> manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
>