[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [cgmo-webcgm] Questions
All,
See embedded
comments:
Benoit Bezaire wrote on Tuesday, January 11, 2005 8:20
AM
Hi all,
While reviewing chapter 5 of the latest spec, I
came accross a few
issues. I wrote them down...
a)
Why are 'version' and 'filename' on the <webcgm> element
#REQUIRED instead of #IMPLIED?
b) In the DTD, the subpara element should allow
for subparaAttEXT
instead of paraAttEXT.
agreed...fixed
c) Replace
<!ELEMENT linkrui EMPTY
with <!ELEMENT
linkuri EMPTY
typo....fixed
d) I think we agreed
to add viewcontext and region to the WebCGM DTD,
is that
correct? If that is right, we should modify the DTD.
I've added region and viewcontext to grobject, para, subpara, bindById, and bindByName. region and viewcontext don't apply to layer, so some wording in the description of the bindBy's needs to include some exclusionary words about applying region and viewcontext to layer. Right now, the attributes are CDATA. I know we wanted something more specific, but NUMBER is not allowed in XML. We could have more control over the content if they were elements instead of attributes, but we still couldn't specify that they be numbers. XML Schema would allow some control on that.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]