Re: [cgmo-webcgm] what it might look like...

[Don Larson <dlarson@cgmlarson.com>]

Lofton proposal looks good to me.

Don Larson.


---- Original message ----
>Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 17:34:57 -0600
>From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>  
>Subject: [cgmo-webcgm] what it might look like...  
>To: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org
>
>[...this time with attachment...]
>
>All --
>
>Here is what the requested defect resolution might look 
like, if we were to 
>go with the "minimal" solution.  Don't take this as 
prejudicing which of 
>the two solution options we select -- that decision needs 
to be made by 
>user advocates, on the one hand, and builders of authoring 
tools and 
>viewers on the other.  Is the minimal solution sufficient 
to everyone's needs?
>
>I have thrown in some explanatory notes, "[LH note...]" in 
italics, only to 
>aid you in understanding and interpreting the proposed 
fixes to the 
>spec.  They would come out before submission.
>
>To recap... our principal decision is whether to suggest 
the minimal fix to 
>CGM:1999 itself -- that would allow to APS-tag 
only 'middle' (and 
>'terminal') substrings and require WebCGM 2.1 to explain 
the 
>zero-length-substring technique to tag the 'initial' string 
case.  Or on 
>the other hand, to suggest an all-case fix, that would 
include 'initial' 
>substring directly, but would require considerably more 
repair to the State 
>Model and EBNF.
>
>-Lofton.
>________________
>substring-APS-defect-minimal.rtf (26k bytes)