OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cgmo-webcgm message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: AW: [cgmo-webcgm] Three FC tests to "reworking"


I have one more question regarding setGetFillOffset.  For all other 9
tests which we reviewed we found accompanying HTML pages, but not for
this test.

Is there an HTML page with a different name that belongs to
setGetFillOffset.cgm & .png?  I noticed there are some tests which have
deviating names for .htm and .cgm, but don't see a matching one.

Regards
Ulrich


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com] 
Gesendet: Samstag, 28. März 2009 20:29
An: cgmo-webcgm@lists.oasis-open.org
Betreff: [cgmo-webcgm] Three FC tests to "reworking"

Forrest,

Combining input from Ulrich's (partial) review, and Rob's MetaCheck 
verification, the following three tests have returned to 'reworking':

setGetBGColor, setGetFillOffset, setGetTextStyles

The critical issue is that they aren't metachek-valid according to some 
already-published WebCGM version (2.0 at least ... possibly 1.0 by 
agreement and negotiation?).

This topic will be on the TC agenda.

All -- I will note that invalid test files may still be usable by 
developers (as in this case), but ... validity and strict conformance is
a 
strong claim of us (the WebCGM developers and advocates), so validity 
problems are something of an embarrassment if we let them stand for too 
long (IMHO).

Regards,
-Lofton.

>From: Robert Orosz <roboro@auto-trol.com>
>To: 'Lofton Henderson' <lofton@rockynet.com>
>[...]
>The following tests should be set to reworking:
>
>setGetBGColor, setGetFillOffset, setGetTextStyles
>
>[... link to ... message in the status column...]
>
>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/cgmo-webcgm/200903/msg00058.html
>
>The above three metafiles claim to be WebCGM 1.0 metafiles, but in fact
are
>not compliant.  We [...] agree that they should at least be valid
WebCGM 1.0
>metafiles, so this is a no-brainer.  We should discuss in next
Wednesday's
>telecon whether we should also require them to be WebCGM 2.1 compliant.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php 




[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]