[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: AW: [cgmo-webcgm] getObjectExtent tests
Hi
All, Leaving out the discussion about the text entent
(which should be tested independently, IMO) the getObjectExtent test still
shows 17 errors when running it through the W3C validator. These errors can simply be cured in just
deleting the first line of the file: “<?xml
version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>“ If you delete this line all errors are gone. Also, the statement about the character code is
ineffective. If you replace the line: <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> with <meta
http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=utf-8"> the file passes the validator without any complaints. Regards Ulrich -----Ursprüngliche
Nachricht----- All -- Although the matrix shows
Ulrich & Forrest with review
action items, I have also marked
them 'reworking'. I suspect, from the gOE(text)
thread, that there may be some
revision needed. We will work this out next
week in telecon discussion. I wonder
... would it make sense to segregate
gOE(text) into a test all by itself? I'm not recommending it, just thinking about it. (I suspect, if anyone fails the gOE
test, it would be because of the
text string.) Regards, -Lofton. [1] ftp://ftp.cgmlarson.com/test-matrix.htm |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]