[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: AW: [cgmo-webcgm] getObjectExtent tests
Hi All,
Leaving out the discussion about the text entent (which should be tested independently, IMO) the getObjectExtent test still shows 17 errors when running it through the W3C validator. These errors can simply be cured in just deleting the first line of the file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
If you delete this line all errors are gone. Also, the statement about the character code is ineffective. If you replace the line:
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
with
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
the file passes the validator without any complaints.
Regards
Ulrich
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Lofton Henderson [mailto:lofton@rockynet.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 24. April 2009 16:19
An: CGM Open WebCGM TC
Betreff: [cgmo-webcgm] getObjectExtent tests
All --
Although the matrix shows Ulrich & Forrest with review action items, I have
also marked them 'reworking'. I suspect, from the gOE(text) thread, that
there may be some revision needed. We will work this out next week in
telecon discussion.
I wonder ... would it make sense to segregate gOE(text) into a test all by
itself? I'm not recommending it, just thinking about it. (I suspect, if
anyone fails the gOE test, it would be because of the text string.)
Regards,
-Lofton.
[1] ftp://ftp.cgmlarson.com/test-matrix.htm
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]