OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

cgmopen-members message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: editing -- oops, correction


Dave,

I am not sure whether this change would be correct.

pictseqno is a keyword, whereas picseqno is just a placeholder for a
character between '0' and '9'. It would have been less confusing to choose a
different expression for this, but I think it is correct.

Dieter

----- Original Message -----
From: "Cruikshank, David W" <David.Cruikshank@PSS.Boeing.com>
To: "'Lofton Henderson'" <lofton@rockynet.com>
Cc: <cgmopen-members@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 6:01 PM
Subject: RE: editing -- oops, correction


> ok, so I think the editing directive is to change the 2 occurrances of
picseqno in 3.1.2.1 to pictseqno...I'll go ahead and do that.
>
> thx..dave
>
> > ----------
> > From: Lofton Henderson[SMTP:lofton@rockynet.com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 3:48 PM
> > To: Cruikshank, David W
> > Cc: cgmopen-members@lists.oasis-open.org
> > Subject: RE: editing -- oops, correction
> >
> > (Oops, I myself fell into the trap of the similar spellings.  Below I
have
> > corrected one "picseqno" mis-use to "picTseqno".  CAPITAL T is for
emphasis
> > only...)
> >
> > Dave,
> >
> > (and CGM Open members/implementors ... speak up if you think my
> > interpretation is wrong.)
> >
> > At 12:50 PM 4/9/01 -0700, you wrote:
> > >[...]I find two spellings "pictseqno" and "picseqno" in the Intelligent
> > >Content section (3).  picseqno is define in the BNR and used in
> > >examples.  pictseqno is used in the BNR and examples....which should it
be?
> >
> > The BNF says:
> >
> > pictsequence ::= "pictseqno(" picseqno ("," behavior)? ")"
> > picseqno ::= [0-9]+
> >
> > which is okay -- picTseqno is a terminal in the grammar (a literal
> > keyword), and picseqno is a non-terminal production.  Then the next
> > paragraph uses picseqno as the keyword (whereas in the BNF the keyword
is
> > clearly picTseqno).  There is similar BNF for picTid (the keyword) and
> > picid (non-terminal), but the paragraph in question correctly uses the
> > keyword picTid.
> >
> > PicTseqno is used in examples 3 & 4.  I do not find picseqno used in any
> > examples.
> >
> > In the balance, I think the two usages in 3.1.2.1 of picseqno are wrong
and
> > need to be changed to picTseqno.
> >
> > (Implementors, does anyone object vigorously?)
> >
> > -Lofton.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> > "unsubscribe" in the body to:
cgmopen-members-request@lists.oasis-open.org
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word
> "unsubscribe" in the body to: cgmopen-members-request@lists.oasis-open.org
>



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC