[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: editing -- oops, correction
Dave, I am not sure whether this change would be correct. pictseqno is a keyword, whereas picseqno is just a placeholder for a character between '0' and '9'. It would have been less confusing to choose a different expression for this, but I think it is correct. Dieter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Cruikshank, David W" <David.Cruikshank@PSS.Boeing.com> To: "'Lofton Henderson'" <lofton@rockynet.com> Cc: <cgmopen-members@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 6:01 PM Subject: RE: editing -- oops, correction > ok, so I think the editing directive is to change the 2 occurrances of picseqno in 3.1.2.1 to pictseqno...I'll go ahead and do that. > > thx..dave > > > ---------- > > From: Lofton Henderson[SMTP:lofton@rockynet.com] > > Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 3:48 PM > > To: Cruikshank, David W > > Cc: cgmopen-members@lists.oasis-open.org > > Subject: RE: editing -- oops, correction > > > > (Oops, I myself fell into the trap of the similar spellings. Below I have > > corrected one "picseqno" mis-use to "picTseqno". CAPITAL T is for emphasis > > only...) > > > > Dave, > > > > (and CGM Open members/implementors ... speak up if you think my > > interpretation is wrong.) > > > > At 12:50 PM 4/9/01 -0700, you wrote: > > >[...]I find two spellings "pictseqno" and "picseqno" in the Intelligent > > >Content section (3). picseqno is define in the BNR and used in > > >examples. pictseqno is used in the BNR and examples....which should it be? > > > > The BNF says: > > > > pictsequence ::= "pictseqno(" picseqno ("," behavior)? ")" > > picseqno ::= [0-9]+ > > > > which is okay -- picTseqno is a terminal in the grammar (a literal > > keyword), and picseqno is a non-terminal production. Then the next > > paragraph uses picseqno as the keyword (whereas in the BNF the keyword is > > clearly picTseqno). There is similar BNF for picTid (the keyword) and > > picid (non-terminal), but the paragraph in question correctly uses the > > keyword picTid. > > > > PicTseqno is used in examples 3 & 4. I do not find picseqno used in any > > examples. > > > > In the balance, I think the two usages in 3.1.2.1 of picseqno are wrong and > > need to be changed to picTseqno. > > > > (Implementors, does anyone object vigorously?) > > > > -Lofton. > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > > "unsubscribe" in the body to: cgmopen-members-request@lists.oasis-open.org > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > "unsubscribe" in the body to: cgmopen-members-request@lists.oasis-open.org >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC